THE ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION FOR THE EARTHQUAKES

Published 31 July 2021 •  vol 14  •  no 2  • 


Authors:

 

Lirong Yin, Geographical & Sustainability Sciences Department, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

Abstract:

 

The paper analyzed the seismic data of County in 1970-2013 using the theory of spatial autocorrelation. Global indices of Moran's I, the local Moran scatter plot, LISA gathered figures and other indicators were applied to do measure and empirical analysis. Research results are following: the County’s earthquakes have positive spatial autocorrelation characteristics, Global Spatial autocorrelation features are notable, the overall pattern of distribution has spatial agglomeration, the differences of seismic activity have a decreasing tendency in different regions of the County.There is significant global autocorrelation features of China continental earthquakes, global autocorrelation coefficients are positive, indicating that mainland China earthquake pattern of spatial agglomeration. The frequency of County earthquake is being spatial accumulation but there are a few local discrete because of spatial heterogeneity, the earthquake happened not only because of where the area adjacent to, but all the geological structure of the area also has a great influence. The great changes of 1976 Tangshan earthquake 75-79 stages gathering have taken place.

Keywords:

 

Seismic, Spatial Autocorrelation, Global Spatial Autocorrelation, Local Spatial Autocorrelation

References:

 

[1] Wenfeng Zheng, Xiaolu Li, et al. Impact of Human Activities on Haze in Beijing Based on Grey Relational Analysis [J]. Rendiconti Lincei, 2015, 26(2): p. 187-192.
[2] Fu, Z. and Y. Cheng, Some characteristics of recent episodic seismicity in the mainland of China. Earthquake, 1986(2): p. 28-35.
[3] Xiaolu Li, Wenfeng Zheng, et al. Predicting seismicity trend in southwest of china based on wavelet analysis [J]. International Journal of Wavelets, Multiresolution and Information Processing, 2005, 13(2): p. 1550011.
[4] Bakun, W.H., Aagaard B, Dost B.et al., Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Nature, 2005. 437(7061): p. 969-974.
[5] Ma, H.-s.,Shao,Z.-g., and Zhou,L.-q., State analysis on M7 earthquake activity in China continent. Earthquake, 2008. 28(3): p. 8-13.
[6] Zhang, F.-j., Wavelet analysis on earthquake trend of northeast seismic region, China. Journal of Seismological Research, 2007. 30(2): p. 137-141.
[7] Wenfeng Zheng, Xiaolu Li, Nina Lam, et al. Applications of Integrated Geophysical Method in Archaeological Surveys of the Ancient Shu Ruins. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2013, 40: p. 166-175.
[8] Grecu V, Mateciuc D. Seismic forecast using geostatistics[J]. Romanian Reports in Physics, 2007, 59(3): 871-917.
[9] Wang, Z.,Zhang,X.-d., et al., Apatial autocorrelation of three nature disasters in China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010. 26(2): p. 302-306.
[10] Pei T, Zhou C, Li Q, et al. Statistical analysis on temporal-spatial correlativity within temporal doublets of strong earthquakes in North China and its vicinity[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2002, 15(1): 56-62.
[11] Telesca L, Lovallo M, Lapenna V, et al. Long-range correlations in two-dimensional spatio-temporal seismic fluctuations[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2007, 377(1): 279-284.
[12] Ogata Y. Significant improvements of the space-time ETAS model for forecasting of accurate baseline seismicity[J]. Earth Planets and Space, 2011, 63(3): 217.
[13] Gutenberg, B. and C. Richter, Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena[M]. 1965, New York: Princeton University Press.
[14] Chen Y. Analogies between urban hierarchies and river networks: Fractals, symmetry, and self-organized criticality[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2009, 40(4): 1766-1778.
[15] Khalid Al-Ahmadi, Abdullah Al-Amri, Linda See.A spatial statistical analysis of the occurrence of earthquakes along the Red Sea floor spreading: clusters of seismicity[J].Arab J Geosci,2014,7:2895-2899.
[16] Alan E. Gelfand , Peter J. Diggle, Peter Guttorp, Montserrat Fuentes .Handbook of spatial statistics[M]. CRC Press, 2010.
[17] Grecu V, Mateciuc D. Seismic forecast using geostatistics[J]. Romanian Reports in Physics, 2007, 59(3): 871-917.
[18] Data source of the earthquake:http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/
[19] Pei T, Zhou C, Li Q, et al. Statistical analysis on temporal-spatial correlativity within temporal doublets of strong earthquakes in North China and its vicinity[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2002, 15(1): 56-62.
[20] Console R, Murru M, Lombardi A M. Refining earthquake clustering models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 2003, 108(B10).
[21] Telesca L. A non-extensive approach in investigating the seismicity of L’Aquila area (central Italy), struck by the 6 April 2009 earthquake (ML= 5.8)[J]. Terra Nova, 2010, 22(2): 87-93.

Citations:

 

APA:
Yin, L., (2021). The Analysis of Spatial Autocorrelation for the Earthquakes. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing (IJGDC), ISSN: 2005-4262 (Print); 2207-6379 (Online), NADIA, 14(2), 35-46. doi: 10.33832/ijgdc.2021.14.2.04.

MLA:
Yin, Lirong, “The Analysis of Spatial Autocorrelation for the Earthquakes.” International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing (IJGDC), ISSN: 2005-4262 (Print); 2207-6379 (Online), NADIA, vol. 14, no. 2, 2021, pp. 35-46. IJGDC, http://article.nadiapub.com/IJGDC/vol14_no2/4.html.

IEEE:
[1] L. Yin, "The Analysis of Spatial Autocorrelation for the Earthquakes." International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing (IJGDC), ISSN: 2005-4262 (Print); 2207-6379 (Online), NADIA, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 35-46, July 2021.