Ahmed Khan, Department of Computer Science,COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Aaliya Sarfaraz, Department of Computer Science,COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan
The programming languages are developing day by day as the change in market’s needs. This transformation drift demands of a language that is sustainable for future use as its fits the new trends and hardware requirements. This change should not only be restricted to industry, but we also believe that academia should follow these inclinations timely. There are several researchers that have compare the programming language using different standards and requirement for better programming language but most of them have agreed that C and Java have complex syntax and are insufficient to keep up to developments of system requirements whereas Python has simpler syntax that make it easy, fast to learn and has packages that make efficient use of processor and follow the changing environment patterns. Python in our view is the language of future and therefore should be the first language that is upskill to the beginners. As a more sustainable language is likely to survive for a longer future.
Python, Programming Languages, Comparison for Programming Languages, Java and Python, Python Standard Libraries, Sustainability
[1] L. Prechelt, "An Empirical Comparison of Seven Programming Languages", Computing Pratices IEEE, pp. 23-29, October 2000.
[2] K. J. Millman and M. Aivazis, "Python for Scientists and Engineers," in Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 9-12, March-April 2011.
[3] T. E. Oliphant, "Python for Scientific Computing," in Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 10-20, May-June 2007.
[4] F. Milano: "A Python-based Software Tool for Power System Analysis", IEEE PES General Meeting 2013, Vancouver, Canada, July 2013.
[5] F. Pérez and B. E. Granger, "IPython: a System for Interactive Scientific Computing", Comput. Sci. Eng., Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 21-29, May 2007.
[6] S. Van Der Walt, S. Colbert, G. Varoquaux, "The numpy array: A structure for efficient numerical computation", Computing in Science Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 22-30, March 2011.
[7] C. A. Lo, Y. T. Lin and C. C. Wu, "Which Programming Language Should Students Learn First? A Comparison of Java and Python," 2015 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, Taipei, 2015, pp. 225-226.
[8] T. L. Cottom, "Using SWIG to bind C++ to Python," in Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 88-97, Mar/Apr 2003.
[9] G. Lindstrom, "Programming with Python," in IT Professional, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 10-16, Sept.-Oct. 2005.
[10] F. Perez, B. E. Granger and J. D. Hunter, "Python: An Ecosystem for Scientific Computing," in Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 13-21, March-April 2011.
[11] Pierce, Benjamin (2002). Types and Programming Languages. MIT Press. p. 339.
[12] Lawlis, Patricia K. (August 1997). "Guidelines for Choosing a Computer Language: Support for the Visionary Organization". Ada Information Clearinghouse. Retrieved 18 July 2006.
[13] Gosling, James; Joy, Bill; Steele, Guy; Bracha, Gilad; Buckley, Alex (2014). The Java® Language Specification.
[14] McConnell, Steve (30 November 2009). Code Complete, p. 100.
[15] "History and License". Retrieved 5 December 2016. "All Python releases are Open Source".
[16] Felleisen, Matthias. On the Expressive Power of Programming Languages. ESOP '90 3rd European Symposium on Programming.
[17] Khan A, Sarfaraz A. (2017). “Vetting the Security of Mobile Applications”, Science International, 29(2), 361-365.
[18] Khan A, Sohaib M, Amjad F M. (2016). “High-Capacity Multi-layer Framework for Highly Robust Textual Steganography“, Science International, 28(5), 4451-4457.
[19] Khan A, Tariq U, Shabbir J, Hassan S. (2016). “Cloud Security Analysis for Health Care Systems”, International Journal of Computer and Communication System Engineering, 3(1), 1-8.
[20] Azeem S, Khan A, Qamar E, Tariq U, Shabbir J. (2016). “A Survey: Different Loss-less Compression Techniques”, International Journal of Technology & Research.,4(1),1-4.
[21] Shah M, Khan A. (2015). “Implementing User Authentication Service for Cloud Network”, Science International, 28(6), 5301-5306.
[22] Khan A. (2015). “Comparative Analysis of Watermarking Techniques”, Science International, 27(6), 6091-6096.
[23] Khan A. (2015). “Robust Textual Steganography”, Journal of Science, 4(4), 426-434.
[24] Khadim U, Khan A, Ahmad B, Khan A. (2015). “Information Hiding in Text to Improve Performance for Word Document”, International Journal of Technology and Research, 3(3), 50-55.
APA:
Khan, A., & Sarfaraz, A., (2021). A Review: Time Efficient Programming Using Python and other Languages. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing (IJGDC), ISSN: 2005-4262 (Print); 2207-6379 (Online), NADIA, 14(1), 65-74. doi: 10.33832/ijgdc.2021.14.1.07.
MLA:
Khan, Ahmed, et al. “A Review: Time Efficient Programming Using Python and other Languages.” International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing (IJGDC), ISSN: 2005-4262 (Print); 2207-6379 (Online), NADIA, vol. 14, no. 1, 2021, pp. 65-74. IJGDC, http://article.nadiapub.com/IJGDC/vol14_no1/7.html.
IEEE:
[1] A. Khan, and A. Sarfaraz, "A Review: Time Efficient Programming Using Python and other Languages." International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing (IJGDC), ISSN: 2005-4262 (Print); 2207-6379 (Online), NADIA, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 65-74, March 2021.
IJGDC aims to facilitate and support research related to grid and distributed computing technology and its applications. Our Journal provides a chance for academic and industry professionals to discuss recent progress in the area of grid and distributed computing technology.
