M. Vijaya Bharathi, BIET Mangalpally & Research Scholar @GITAMU, India
Sireesha Rodda, GITAM University, India
Nikitha R, Bits Pilani Campus, UAE
Testing is a basic period of programming advancement life cycle. This work goes for investigating the part that the length of test successions plays in testing programming. Specifically, we focus on the branch scope paradigm. Code scope is a measure used to depict how much the source code of a program is executed when a specific test suite runs. To acquire high scope a typical practice is to apply a first period of arbitrary testing, trailed by more modern methods went for covering the rest of the branches. we dissect just this second stage. For each troublesome branch we examine the errand of finding a solitary and insignificant succession to cover it. Indeed, to cover a specific branch of the code, an arrangement of past capacity calls may be required to put the inward state in the suitable design. Here we have taken one illustration program and composed diverse length test arrangements for that. We tended to the distinction in scope when diverse length test arrangements are utilized. To test the program, we have utilized mechanized devices JUnit for segment testing. When it is over, utilizing EclEmma the scope of experiments is assessed and demonstrated enhanced arrangements are ideal.
Test Sequence, Coverage, Empirical
[1] Andrea Arcuri "A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Role of Test Sequence Length in Software Testing for Structural Coverage",IEEE VOL. 38, NO. 3, MAY/JUNE 2012.
[2] "Random Testing: Theoretical Results and Practical Implications" Andrea Arcuri, Member, IEEE IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL. 38, NO. 2, MARCH2012.
[3] Arcuri, “Longer Is Better: On the Role of Test Sequence Length in Software Testing,” Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. Software Testing, Verification and Validation, 2010.
[4] "Are Longer Test Sequences Always Better? - A Reliability Theoretical Analysis" by Fevzi Belli1, Nevin Güler 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Secure Software Integration.
[5] J.H. Andrews, A. Groce, M. Weston, and R.G. Xu, “Random Test Run Length and Effectiveness,” Proc. IEEE/ACM Int’l Conf. Automated Software Eng., pp. 19-28, 2009.
[6] G. Fraser and A. Gargantini, “Experiments on the Test Case Length in Specification Based Test Case Generation,” Proc. Int’l Workshop Automation in Software Test, 2009.
[7] B. Raveendranath Singh "Impact of Length of Test Sequence on Coverage in Software Testing", Special Issue of ICETEM Vol.2 , No.6.
[8] G. Vivek, R.C. Narayanan "Minimization of Test Sequence Length for Structural Coverage Using VLR" IJRIT , Volume 1, Issue 5.
[9] “Fundamentals of software Engineering” Rajib Mal 3rd edition, Eastern Economy Edition, ISBN-978- 81-203-3819-7.
[10] Software Engineering, A practitioner’s Approach- Roger S. Pressman, 6th edition. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
[11] V. Kecman, “Learning and Soft computing”, Pearson Education, India.
[12] Principles of Soft Computing- S N Sivanandam, SN Deepa, Wiley India, 2011.
[13] “The Unified Modelling Language Reference manual” Second edition by Ivar Jacobson, James R Rumbaugh, Grady Booch.
[14] “Unified Modeling User Guide” by Ivar Jacobson, James R Rumbaugh,Grady Booch.
[15] “Object Oriented Modeling and Design with UML” Second Edition by Michael R Blaha, James R Rumbaugh.
[16] K. Koteswara Rao, G. S. V. P. Raju and S. Nagaraj, “Optimizing the software testing efficiency by using a genetic algorithm: a design methodology”, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 38, no.3, (2013), pp. 1-5.
[17] K. K. Rao and G. S. V. P. Raju, “Developing optimal directed random testing technique to reduce Interactive faults-systematic literature and design methodology”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 8, (2015), pp. 715-719.
[18] K. Koteswara Rao and G. S. V. P. Raju, “Theoretical Investigations to Random Testing Variants and its Implications”, International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, vol. 9, no. 5, (2015),pp. 165-172.
[19] 19. J. Ratna Kumar, K. Koteswara Rao and D. Ganesh, “Empirical Investigations to Find Illegal and its Equivalent Test Cases using RANDOM-DELPHI”, International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, vol. 9, no. 11, (2015), pp. 107-116.
[20] 20 K. Koteswara Rao and G. S. V. P. Raju, “Random Testing: The Best Coverage Technique-An empirical Proof”, International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, vol. 9, no. 12, (2015), pp.115-122.
[21] 21. K. Koteswara Rao, “Measuring the Function Points from the Points of Relationships of UML”, Computer and Electrical Engineering, ICCEE 2008. International Conference on IEEE, (2008).
APA:
Vijaya Bharathi, M., & Rodda, S. (2019). Role of Test Sequence Length in Software Testing for Structural Coverage-An Empirical Proof. International Journal of Control and Automation (IJCA), ISSN: 2005-4297 (Print); 2207-6387 (Online), NADIA, 12(3), 49-62. doi: 10.33832/ijca.2019.12.3.05.
MLA:
Bharathi, M. Vijaya, et al. “Role of Test Sequence Length in Software Testing for Structural Coverage-An Empirical Proof.” International Journal of Control and Automation, ISSN: 2005-4297 (Print); 2207-6387 (Online), NADIA, vol. 12, no. 3, 2019, pp. 49-62. IJCA, http://article.nadiapub.com/IJCA/vol12_no3/5.html.
IEEE:
[1] M. Vijaya Bharathi, and S. Rodda, "Role of Test Sequence Length in Software Testing for Structural Coverage-An Empirical Proof." International Journal of Control and Automation (IJCA), ISSN: 2005-4297 (Print); 2207-6387 (Online), NADIA, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 49-62, Mar 2019.
IJCA aims to facilitate and support research related to control and automation and its applications. Our Journal provides a chance for academic and industry professionals to discuss recent progress in the area of control and automation.
